Making digital spaces a place of authentic dialogue with citizens: editorial presence, community engagement, online mobilisation and rigorous measurement of impact.
Candidates, parties, elected officials and organisations engaged in online public debate.
On an ongoing basis; a digital presence is built well before campaigns and continues beyond them.
Digital strategy, editorial line, content calendar, moderation framework, impact reports.
The rapid spread of mobile internet has profoundly transformed political communication on the continent. Social networks, video platforms and instant messaging have become major spaces for information, discussion and mobilisation, especially for younger generations.
These spaces also carry well-documented risks: echo chambers, polarisation, viral spread of false information, use of inauthentic accounts. A responsible digital strategy must take advantage of opportunities for direct dialogue while refusing to contribute to the degradation of the information space.
We design digital strategies based on quality content, authentic community engagement, active listening to conversations and honest measurement of impact — far from vanity metrics.
A structured digital presence, consistent with the overall campaign strategy.
Choice of platforms, objectives, audiences and coordination with other channels.
Formats suited to each platform: short video, visuals, text, live broadcasts.
Dialogue with citizens, answering questions, highlighting genuine supporters.
Organising distribution through messaging apps, with participants’ consent.
Transparent moderation rules, handling of hate speech and disruption attempts.
Indicators of reach, meaningful engagement and conversion to action.
A step-by-step approach that prioritises credibility and real engagement.
Analysis of existing presence, audiences and conversations.
Defining objectives, platforms, editorial line and resources.
Creating and publishing content, community engagement and moderation.
Performance analysis and continuous optimisation.
Every tool we use is documented: its sources, assumptions and limitations are known to our clients.
Aggregate analysis of public conversations to identify themes and concerns.
Comparing formats and wording to identify the most relevant.
Public, consistent rules applied across all discussion spaces.
Tracking meaningful indicators beyond follower counts alone.
Every indicator is labelled by status — target, calculated estimate or measured result — in line with our principles of rigour
| Indicator | What it shows | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Meaningful engagement | Substantive interactions: shares with comments, questions, sign-ups. | Measured result |
| Content reach | The number of people exposed, as reported by platforms. | Measured result |
| Online mobilisation | The number of sign-ups or participations the campaign sets itself. | Target |
| Tone of conversations | The overall orientation of exchanges about the candidacy. | Calculated estimate |
We refuse any practice that distorts online public debate.
No inauthentic accounts, bots or artificial simulation of popular support.
We neither create nor share false, misleading or manipulated content.
Sponsored content and paid relays are clearly identified.
We comply with platform rules on advertising and civic integrity.
In the digital space, trust is won through authenticity, never through artifice.AXIOME working principle
Illustrative situations: they do not describe actual engagements.
A candidacy seeks dialogue with young voters who get their information mainly online.
A party has many uncoordinated accounts, sometimes with contradictory messages.
A campaign faces waves of hostile comments and needs calm, organised moderation.
No. A quality presence on the platforms actually used by target audiences is better than a superficial presence everywhere.
Through indicators of meaningful engagement and action, rather than follower numbers alone, which can be misleading.
Document it, respond with verified facts where useful, and report it to platforms through their procedures.
Every political context is unique. A first, strictly confidential conversation allows us to understand what is at stake and define the most relevant support.